
Originally Posted by
nuraman00
If Ellis-Jennings didn't work out, why would Evans-Jennings? I could see Milwaukee making a bad offer to someone in general, because that's what they seem to do, but I think after Ellis-Jennings, they'd want a more normal backcourt.
Detroit is a good pick. Especially if they can't resign Calderon. But it also seems like they keep getting the same guard. Stuckey, Knight, Will Bynum, Ben Gordon, aren't these all very similar?
Atlanta would probably spend money on a big, not a guard, if they lose Smith. I think Dwight Howard should sign with Portland, but a Howard-Horford frontcourt, or a Howard-Horford-Smith, would be great. And given how the Lakers season is going, it's 50/50 that Howard would want to get out of there. Bryant isn't going anywhere (you just can't trade Bryant, marketing disaster), so Howard has a 50/50 chance of signing with another team.
I could see Charlotte doing it.
Also, even though I don't think Milwaukee or Detroit should logically make an offer, as I don't like the fit, they probably would still do it anyways.
If Evans gets an offer for $10M, do a sign-and-trade then. Even though it's better (IMO) for an outside team to sign a player outright, they end up doing sign-and-trades more times than not, to keep their payroll down. So if Evans gets a big offer, I'm pretty sure the Kings can get some kind of player and 1st round draft pick back. That's why I'm not that worried about what happens to Evans. If another team doesn't make him a big offer, then resign him. If another team makes him a big offer, then do a sign-and-trade. Both of those outcomes look pretty good to me.
I guess there's the possibility of the 3rd option. The Kings make him a big offer to keep him. I have a feeling the Kings management won't do that this time, but maybe I'm wrong.
Bookmarks