Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: Kings and Jazz Game Thread

  1. #21
    Forum Master kingraider412's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hollywood Beach, Fl
    Posts
    2,099
    Utah TOs only reason the Kings were in it. You would think a reflection of the Kings D, but Jazz shot almost 53 percent. The Kings 40.






  2. #22
    Forum Master kingraider412's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hollywood Beach, Fl
    Posts
    2,099
    Wins will be very sporadic the rest of the way.No trades, lame duck coach, and uncertainty in ownership.
    I wonder what new ownership is going to do with Cuz. Do they really want Cuz as the face of the franchise or do they blow this thing up completely?






  3. #23
    Forum Master kingraider412's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hollywood Beach, Fl
    Posts
    2,099
    Well, the Jazz played without Heyward, Watson, and Williams.
    Overall, yes the Jazz has better talent. I think Favors/Jefferson is marginally better than Cuz/Thompson. The backcourt is pretty even. The bench is where the Jazz have a significant advantage.






  4. #24
    Microphone Master IowaSacKing93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Sewer
    Posts
    5,088
    Evans: 40 minutes/3 assists
    Thomas: 38 minutes/3 assists
    Fredette: 13 minuets/ 1 assist











  5. #25
    Microphone Master IowaSacKing93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Sewer
    Posts
    5,088
    Quote Originally Posted by IowaSacKing93 View Post
    Evans: 40 minutes/3 assists
    Thomas: 38 minutes/3 assists
    Fredette: 13 minuets/ 1 assist
    I know this isn't anything new, but it's just bad











  6. #26
    Forum Master bloatedmaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    11,335
    Quote Originally Posted by kingraider412 View Post
    Wins will be very sporadic the rest of the way.No trades, lame duck coach, and uncertainty in ownership.
    I wonder what new ownership is going to do with Cuz. Do they really want Cuz as the face of the franchise or do they blow this thing up completely?
    They'd likely give him one more year to shape up in hopes of the best. Sadly, he is killing the potential value of any returns. He has the talent of a star mixed with the maturity of Macaulay Culkin. The ultimate hope is to surround him with players who don't suck in every way in hopes it improves his mood by actually winning. Maybe even a point guard who can notch more than 3 assists.






  7. #27
    Super Moderator nuraman00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    25,295
    Quote Originally Posted by bloatedmaniac View Post
    They'd likely give him one more year to shape up in hopes of the best. Sadly, he is killing the potential value of any returns. He has the talent of a star mixed with the maturity of Macaulay Culkin. The ultimate hope is to surround him with players who don't suck in every way in hopes it improves his mood by actually winning. Maybe even a point guard who can notch more than 3 assists.
    I liked Macaulay Culkin. Not only did I like the Home Alone movies (the first two), but I bought the book, based off of the first movie.

    Getting Even With Dad; My Girl; Richie Rich were good too. The Good Son was a different type of movie, but also worth watching.













  8. #28
    Super Moderator nuraman00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    25,295
    Quote Originally Posted by kingraider412 View Post
    Well, the Jazz played without Heyward, Watson, and Williams.
    Overall, yes the Jazz has better talent. I think Favors/Jefferson is marginally better than Cuz/Thompson. The backcourt is pretty even. The bench is where the Jazz have a significant advantage.
    Hayward was out so the Jazz weren't really deeper.

    The Jazz are also 28th in bench efficiency:

    http://www.hoopsstats.com/basketball...s/11/7/eff/1-1

    And 27th in bench points:

    http://www.hoopsstats.com/basketball...s/11/7/pts/1-1













  9. #29
    Administrator Eze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    3,979
    Think you have to ride out DeMarcus and hope he eventually gets it - or part with him in his final year of a contract if he gets really bad. The return would be so minimal given his issues, it would be pointless to give him up. You'd be lucky to get 40 cents out of your dollar at this point.











Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •